shreyasharma to Dave, David, Jack on 28 Jun 2013.
David Freeborn answered on 28 Jun 2013:
I really hope so. But it’s possible we won’t. There’s no reason to believe that our brains have evolved far enough to be able to comprehend the Universe. Our brains have basically evolved for scavenging on the African savannah, so it’s actually pretty amazing that we’ve got this far.
The Universe does show signs of impressive elegance and simplicity in its laws. A lot of physicists do think we are tantalisingly close to a Grand Unified Theory, certainly the laws we have describe the Universe remarkably well. If only we could find some way to fit the pieces of the jigsaw together…
On the other hand, some physicists think the Universe might be infinitely complicated.
Dave Farmer answered on 28 Jun 2013:
Like David said, it’s impossible to know if it’s possible to have a theory of everything yet!
I do hope that we will get there, but I’m not sure I’d put money on it. There are too many possible extinction scenarios for the human race to made predictions too far into the future I think.
Jack Miller answered on 28 Jun 2013:
Like the others, I hope so. I’m not sure that we will — but there’s a bigger trouble than ‘merely’ just writing down something that describes everything: we’ve got to use it.
At the moment, we’ve got a pretty good understanding of three of the four fundamental forces in nature — everything except gravity. We can use that understanding to predict quantities we can measure to phenomenal accuracy…but actually doing that calculation is really, really hard. It’s so hard, in fact, that to work out exactly what happens to a single particle moving in free space requires maths of the type that won Feynman his nobel prize.
The world around us is a lot more complicated than a single particle moving in a straight line. I think that for a ‘theory of everything’ to justify the name, it has to be able to be used to explain everything — and most things we see on an every-day basis require a theory that’s more geared to explaining them. It’s very unlikely that we’ll ever develop either enough computing power or clever enough mathematics to be able to actually solve a ‘theory of everything’ to explain complex systems, or something more complicated than a subatomic particles interacting.
Hope that helps!
Have you did(in your mind) any thought experiment? How does thought experiments help scientists to get new ideas and
At one hand we have superstring theory with 12 dimensions and on the other hand holographic principle which says the
It seems that there are many theories to explain 'High-Temperature Superconductivity'. Which one would you prefer and
It seems there are many theories on multiverse or parallel universes so, if you had the chance to vote for any of them